Clear Guides to Lawsuits, Toxic Exposure, and Consumer Safety

Where each case stands in court and in Congress, with plain-language guides written for the people affected.

Attorney-led by David Meldofsky. Three publications: Lawsuit Informer (legal education) · Lawsuit Center (case review) · Lawsuit Intelligencer (industry analysis)

Latest in Court

AS OF NOV 6, 2026All 16 cases we track →
  • Depo-ProveraSIGN-UP DEADLINEUPDATED NOV 1 · DEADLINE NOV 30

    The lead lawyers told the court that settlement sign-ups are open and close November 30.

  • ParaquatSETTLEMENT STALLEDUPDATED NOV 6

    The judge ordered the lawyer for the largest group of holdouts to disclose who funds his cases.

  • Talcum PowderSETTLEMENT PENDINGUPDATED NOV 6

    An Ohio jury found for J&J in a mesothelioma death case.

  • Social Media AddictionTRIAL SETUPDATED NOV 6 · NEXT FEB 8

    West Virginia sued Snap over Snapchat’s effect on children.

  • PFAS Water Contamination3M INJURY DEAL; CASES AGAINST 3M PAUSEDUPDATED NOV 5 · NEXT NOV 13

    The judge set November 13 as the deadline to list every person eligible for the 3M injury deal.

Latest in Congress

AS OF NOV 5, 2026All 35 bills we follow →
  • CHATBOT Act (Senate)CLEARED COMMITTEELAST MOVE AUG 5, 2026

    AI Chatbots and Kids: Chatbot apps would have to offer family accounts and parental controls for kids.

  • Kids Online Safety Act (Senate)CLEARED COMMITTEELAST MOVE AUG 5, 2026

    Social Media Addiction: Platforms would have a duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to kids.

  • Defense Bill for 2027 (Senate)CLEARED COMMITTEELAST MOVE JUL 14, 2026

    PFAS Water Contamination: The yearly defense bill. A proposed change filed against it would shield water utilities from PFAS cleanup costs.

  • KIDS Act (House)PASSED THE HOUSELAST MOVE JUN 29, 2026

    Social Media Addiction: The House's package of online safety bills for kids.

  • NO FAKES Act (Senate)CLEARED COMMITTEELAST MOVE JUN 24, 2026

    Grok and Deepfakes: People could stop others from using a digital copy of their voice or face.

FEATURED ANALYSIS · UPDATED MAY 12, 2026

OpenAI Lawsuits: ChatGPT Wrongful Death, Self-Harm, and Mass Shooting Claims

Four major civil actions filed against OpenAI between August 2025 and May 2026 are forcing courts to answer a question that, until recently, was almost entirely theoretical: when a generative AI system produces an output that contributes to serious harm, is that output a product, or is it content? Attorney analysis of the current docket, the doctrinal questions ahead, and what to watch next.

Read the analysis →

For parents: see our calm, practical family guide to AI chatbots — how to talk with your teen, what healthy use looks like, and where to turn if you have concerns.

MEET THE FOUNDER

Attorney-Led, with a Specific View on Why This Site Exists

Lawsuit Informer was founded by David Meldofsky, a California-licensed attorney, because the public-facing legal internet has become difficult to read honestly. Lawsuit pages routinely mix education, advertising, and case intake without signaling which is which, and AI-generated content has made the line harder to find.

The site is the response: pages written or reviewed by a licensed attorney, with visible authorship, dated review notes, and editorial work kept separate from case intake.

David's writing has been published in Attorney at Law Magazine, Law360, and the Daily Journal, with a focus on PFAS regulation, drinking water standards, and consumer-facing legal content.

Read David's full profile →

As Featured In

Published in Law360

Is AI Output a Product or Content?

A guest commentary by David Meldofsky examining whether AI-generated output should be treated as a product subject to liability or as content — the central doctrinal question now surfacing in the OpenAI litigation and the broader wave of AI injury claims.

Read on Law360 (subscription) →

Read the full article

Published in Attorney at Law Magazine — Free to read

What a Verdict Number Actually Means in Mass Torts

A bylined feature on what the numbers in a mass tort mean for the people bringing claims — how a bellwether verdict changes after trial and on appeal, how a settlement fund is divided into tiers, and what fees, costs, and liens come out of a gross award.

Read on Attorney at Law Magazine →

Published in Attorney at Law Magazine — Free to read

Before You Contact a Lawyer: How to Evaluate Lawsuit Information Online in the AI Era

A bylined feature outlining the editorial philosophy behind Lawsuit Informer — how consumers can evaluate online legal information, including AI-generated guidance, and distinguish education from intake before contacting a lawyer.

Read on Attorney at Law Magazine →

Published in Law360

PFAS OUT Cannot Replace Broad Drinking Water Protections

A guest commentary by David Meldofsky addressing EPA's PFAS reporting posture, the difference between regulatory shifts and safety determinations, and the implications for regulated entities and affected communities.

Read on Law360 (subscription) →

Published in the Daily Journal

PFAS Drinking Water Rules Are Changing as Lawsuits Surge

A guest commentary by David Meldofsky on EPA's PFAS reconsideration, federal and California drinking water standards, and the broader litigation landscape facing regulated entities and affected communities.

Read on Daily Journal (subscription) →

Featured Lawsuit Topics

Explore major lawsuit topics involving toxic exposure, dangerous products, and environmental contamination.

Toxic Exposure and Environmental Claims

Consumer Products and Product Liability

Additional and Emerging Topics

How Lawsuit Informer Works

Six commitments every page on the site is held to.

Written or Reviewed by an Attorney

Every substantive page is written or reviewed by David Meldofsky, a California-licensed attorney, before publication. The site does not publish anonymous content.

Editorial Separated from Intake

Lawsuitinformer.com is the editorial site. Case intake happens on a separate site, lawsuit.center. Calls-to-action are clearly labeled, and editorial decisions aren't driven by intake partners.

Dated Review on Every Page

Substantive pages carry a "last updated" date. Pages on developing topics — PFAS, AFFF, AI litigation — are reviewed on a rolling basis as regulations and case law change.

Disclosed Use of AI in Drafting

AI tools are used in parts of research and drafting. Every published page is reviewed by a licensed attorney for legal accuracy and framing before going live. Disclosed openly on the Editorial Policy.

Medical Review on Health Content

Medical sections of pages discussing symptoms, illness, or toxic exposure are reviewed for general accuracy by Dr. Thomas A. Hatzilabrou, M.D.

Corrections Welcome

If a page contains a factual error or outdated citation, the corrections form sends it directly to editorial review. Substantive corrections update the page's review date.

COMMUNITY OUTREACH

Public Outreach

Lawsuit Informer also supports selected outreach and educational efforts related to legal literacy, consumer safety, and civil lawsuit basics.

Learn About the Program