Recent Developments in Transvaginal Mesh Litigation
Read a broader update on major litigation developments, FDA action, and how the overall transvaginal mesh landscape changed over time.
Read the litigation update →Last updated: April 2, 2026
Transvaginal mesh lawsuits have involved allegations that certain pelvic mesh products caused serious complications, including erosion, chronic pain, infection, urinary problems, sexual dysfunction, and the need for revision surgery. This page is a starting point for readers who want to understand the broader litigation history, the status of the main federal pelvic mesh proceedings, and how public product-identification records may help connect a procedure to a manufacturer or product family.
This page provides general educational information and does not constitute legal advice.
Transvaginal mesh refers to certain surgical mesh products used in procedures involving pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. Over time, many patients reported complications that led to major safety concerns, regulatory scrutiny, and large-scale product liability litigation.
These lawsuits grew in part because many claims involved similar allegations against major manufacturers, including claims involving product design, warnings, complications after implantation, and repeat surgeries. Large numbers of federal cases were centralized in pelvic mesh multidistrict litigations, often called MDLs.
The largest pelvic mesh MDLs were centralized in the Southern District of West Virginia. The court’s MDL listings show the major proceedings involving Bard, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, Ethicon, and Coloplast as closed. That does not mean every legal question involving pelvic mesh disappeared, but it does mean the main federal MDL phase is no longer active in the same way it once was.
FDA materials explain that in 2019 the agency ordered manufacturers to stop selling surgical mesh intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse in the United States. FDA guidance also explains that women who already received these products should continue routine follow-up care and speak with their healthcare providers about symptoms or complications.
Lawsuits and public safety discussions often focused on allegations involving mesh erosion, chronic pelvic pain, infection, bleeding, urinary problems, painful intercourse, organ perforation, and the need for revision or removal surgery. In many cases, the disputes centered on whether the products were adequately tested, how risks were described, and whether warnings were sufficient.
In many mesh cases, one of the most important questions is which product was actually implanted. Public FDA records may help identify a manufacturer, product family, or related clearance history. But exact identification often depends on medical records such as operative reports, implant stickers, hospital records, and revision surgery documentation.
Read a broader update on major litigation developments, FDA action, and how the overall transvaginal mesh landscape changed over time.
Read the litigation update →Use the reference page to review manufacturers, product families, and selected public FDA identifiers that may help with product research.
Explore product identifiers →Even though the major federal MDLs are closed, readers still research this subject for several reasons. Some are trying to understand older litigation history. Others are reviewing medical records, identifying an implanted product, comparing manufacturers, or learning how pelvic mesh litigation fit into broader mass tort and product liability practice.
Ready to explore related cases and legal topics? Browse the lawsuit directory or learn how the legal process works.
If you're trying to understand whether this situation may apply to you, you can share a few details below to get started.
Educational purposes only. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Read a broader update on major litigation developments, FDA action, and the overall status of mesh cases.
Review manufacturers, product families, and public product-identification resources.
Get a simple overview of how legal claims are investigated, filed, and resolved over time.
Understand how coordinated proceedings work when many similar claims move through court together.
Compare class actions with other forms of coordinated civil litigation.