AFFF Foam Exposure: Firefighter and Military Claims

By David Meldofsky, California-licensed attorney · Founder, Lawsuit Informer

Last updated: September 6, 2026

AFFF is the foam used to put out fuel fires. Airports, military bases, industrial plants and fire departments have relied on it for decades because it works on burning jet fuel and gasoline in a way water does not. For most of that time it contained PFAS, the chemicals that do not break down.

The lawsuits come from two directions. Firefighters and service members who handled the foam year after year. And people whose drinking water sat downstream of a base, an airport or a training ground where it was sprayed.

Important:

This page provides general educational information about AFFF litigation, PFAS exposure, and related health concerns. It does not constitute medical or legal advice.

Key Takeaways:
On This Page

Video Explainer

PFAS Forever Chemicals: Health Risks and Lawsuits Explained

A four-minute overview of PFAS exposure — including AFFF firefighting foam — and the lawsuits currently moving through the courts. Watch on YouTube.

AFFF Lawsuit Update: Where the Litigation Stands (June 2026)

Nearly all the federal cases sit together in one court as MDL 2873, in South Carolina before Judge Richard M. Gergel. As of June 2026 more than 15,000 were pending, roughly double the count in early 2025, and new ones keep arriving.

Here is the distinction that matters more than anything else on this page. There are two separate tracks, and the money you have read about belongs to only one of them.

The water track is for cities and utilities whose supplies were contaminated. Those cases produced the enormous settlements: 3M at up to about $10.3 billion, DuPont, Chemours and Corteva at about $1.185 billion, and Carrier Global at about $730 million out of the Kidde-Fenwal bankruptcy. That money pays for treating and monitoring water. None of it goes to a person with cancer.

The injury track is for individuals. As of June 2026 it had produced no settlement at all. The first test trial was set for October 2025 and taken off the calendar when filings surged, and the court has been working through case management and evidence questions since. In mid-2025 it held a Science Day, where both sides presented expert evidence on whether PFAS causes thyroid and liver cancer, which shapes what a jury will eventually be allowed to hear.

So if you are searching for an AFFF settlement and finding headlines with billions in them, those headlines are about water systems. The individual side is still in pretrial.

What Is AFFF Firefighting Foam?

AFFF stands for aqueous film-forming foam. It smothers fuel fires by spreading a film across the burning liquid, which is why airports, military bases, industrial plants and fire departments have used it on gasoline and jet fuel for decades.

Many AFFF products contained PFAS. People call them forever chemicals because they do not break down in soil, in water, or in the body.

Why People Research AFFF Lawsuits

The claim is that PFAS from the foam soaked into the ground at training sites, bases, airports and industrial locations, reached the water, and stayed there. And that years of contact with it, at work or through a tap, raised the risk of serious illness.

What these cases dig into is what the manufacturers knew, when they knew it, what the label said, and how the contamination spread.

For a more current overview of how PFAS water claims, public water system settlements, AFFF litigation, and individual injury claims may overlap, read our PFAS water contamination lawsuit update.

Firefighter and Military Occupational Exposure

Firefighters and service members make up a large share of the individual plaintiffs. Career and volunteer firefighters describe exposure during training drills, equipment testing and real calls, often across a whole career. Military firefighters describe foam drills, crash response and hangar systems on bases where AFFF was standard for decades.

A work claim rests on different evidence than a community water claim. What your job was and when. Training records. Which foam your station or base actually used. What protective gear was worn, if any. And when the diagnosis came. Firefighter unions have pushed for broader protections, and some states now treat certain cancers as occupational illnesses for firefighters by default.

Service members face one extra wrinkle. You generally cannot sue the government over this, so military AFFF cases run against the foam manufacturers instead. Veterans who lived or worked on a base with known contamination sometimes also look at water claims.

Is AFFF Being Recalled or Phased Out?

There has been no recall in the ordinary sense. What is happening is a phase-out, and it is a big part of why AFFF has been in the news. A 2020 defence law ordered the Pentagon to stop buying PFAS-based foam and stop using it on bases, with a deadline of October 1, 2024 and the option of two one-year extensions.

It took both. Some use now runs to October 1, 2026 while roughly a thousand facilities and more than six thousand vehicles and aircraft switch to fluorine-free foam. The military specification for the replacement was published in January 2023 and several approved products now exist. Many civilian airports and fire departments are making the same change, and a number of states have banned PFAS-based foam for training.

A phase-out is not proof that any product caused any illness. What it does mean is that the places that used the most of it are winding down, while disposing of old stock and cleaning up contaminated ground remain open problems.

Who May Be Affected

Health Concerns Discussed in These Cases

Which conditions a case involves depends on the kind of exposure, how long it went on, the medical history, and what the research supports. This page explains what people research. It cannot tell you what caused a particular diagnosis.

Common Sources of Alleged Exposure

Types of Claims Involved

Some contamination lawsuits also involve PFAS water contamination, where communities allege that long-term exposure to these chemicals may be linked to serious health risks.

Where the claim is about a job rather than a water supply, the focus shifts to work history, training history, what the job actually involved, what protective gear existed, and which product it was.

Why These Cases Can Be Complex

Time is the first problem. Decades can pass between spraying foam and a diagnosis, and the records that would prove what you handled rarely survive that long.

Proof of exposure is the second. A community case may turn on water testing and contamination maps. A work case turns on your own history. And more than one company made the foam, so working out whose product reached you is its own task.

One distinction causes more confusion in AFFF litigation than any other. The large, widely reported PFAS settlements went to public water systems and municipalities to fund water treatment, not to individual people with cancer or other PFAS-linked illnesses. The personal-injury track for individuals is on a separate path and has not produced a global settlement. If you have a personal-injury claim, news of a multibillion-dollar settlement may not mean what it appears to mean for your situation. Our guide on how mass tort cases are structured and resolved explains this water-utility versus personal-injury split in plain terms, and the Where Does My Lawsuit Stand? tracker shows what phase the AFFF personal-injury track is in right now and what the next milestone is.

Common Questions About AFFF Lawsuits

What is AFFF firefighting foam?

A foam used on fuel fires. The lawsuits are about the PFAS many AFFF products contained, which do not break down and which research has tied to several illnesses.

Who usually researches these claims?

Firefighters, service members, airport and industrial workers, and people who lived near contaminated water.

How are AFFF lawsuits connected to PFAS?

PFAS is what made the foam work and what made it a problem. The cases say those chemicals got into water supplies and into the people who handled the foam.

Can AFFF claims involve both workers and nearby communities?

Yes, and they are argued differently. A worker claim is about a job. A community claim is about a water supply.

Is there an AFFF settlement for individuals?

No. As of June 2026 there was no settlement for individual injury claims. The billion-dollar figures in the news settled claims by public water systems and pay for water treatment. Individual cases are still in pretrial.

Has AFFF been recalled?

Not recalled, but being phased out. Congress ordered the military off PFAS-based foam, and that deadline now runs to October 1, 2026 as bases switch to a fluorine-free replacement.

How does this page relate to broader contamination claims?

AFFF cases often overlap with PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuits, Toxic Water Contamination Lawsuits, Environmental Contamination Lawsuits, and Chemical Exposure Lawsuits.

Related Lawsuit Topics

Request an AFFF Case Review

If you believe you may have been exposed to AFFF firefighting foam, through firefighting work, military service, airport or industrial operations, or contaminated water near a known AFFF site, you can request a case review on Lawsuit Center.

You can also continue reading PFAS water contamination lawsuits, water contamination illnesses, or chemical exposure and kidney cancer first.

Request an AFFF Case Review →

Educational purposes only. Submitting the form on Lawsuit Center does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Related Legal Guides

David Meldofsky

About the Author

David Meldofsky is a California-licensed attorney and the founder of Lawsuit Informer, an educational platform focused on helping people understand lawsuits, consumer safety issues, and legal rights related to defective products and toxic exposures.

Learn more about our Editorial Policy, About page, or Contact us.

Last Updated: September 6, 2026

Educational information only. Not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.