Recent Developments in Hernia Mesh Litigation
Last updated:
This case is one of 17 we track. See where each one stands →
People go into hernia repair expecting a routine operation. These cases are brought by people who came out of it with chronic pain, infection, or a second surgery to fix the first.
Some of the older groups of cases have largely wound down. Others are still going. This page covers where things stand, and the one question that decides almost everything: which product was actually used.
If you had hernia repair with mesh and later needed more surgery, or have lived with problems that started after it, you can ask for a free case review. Whether that history supports a claim depends on which mesh was used, what your medical records show, and how long ago it happened. Pick the situation that fits:
Free and no obligation. Deadlines are set by your state, and the clock can start when the problem was discovered. Submitting a review request does not create an attorney-client relationship.
- Bard settlement payments are going out, in order of filing date. The latest case count for each group is on the Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Update.
- Covidien has not settled. A Boston jury awarded $88 million in the first Covidien trial in August. On November 10 the judge said she will reduce that award.
- The next Covidien trials are set for January 11 and March 29, 2027.
- New Covidien cases are still being filed, in federal court and in Massachusetts state court.
- Records from a revision or removal surgery often show which mesh was used and what went wrong.
Important notice
This page provides general educational information and does not constitute legal advice.
What Has Moved Recently
The dates below run newest first. Case counts for each group are on the Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Update.
- , Judge Patti B. Saris said she will reduce the $88 million verdict in the first Covidien trial. At a hearing in Boston, she called the award shocking and excessive. She has not yet set the new amount, and she urged both sides to consider settling.
- , a Tennessee man sued Covidien in Massachusetts state court over its Parietene mesh. He says the mesh, used to repair an inguinal hernia, caused nerve damage and chronic pain and led to more surgeries, including its removal.
- , the court chose the Passmore case to test Covidien’s ProGrip mesh at trial. That trial is set for March 29, 2027.
- , Covidien asked the judge to throw out the $88 million verdict, order a new trial, or cut the award. On November 10 the judge said she will reduce the award.
- , the court set the second Covidien trial for January 11, 2027. It involves a Mississippi woman whose Symbotex mesh was removed in 2020. A final hearing before trial is set for December 10, 2026.
- , Judge Patti B. Saris said she was likely to reduce the $88 million award. A reduced award gives the Pattersons a choice. They can accept the lower amount or ask for a new trial.
- , a Boston jury awarded $88 million in the first Covidien hernia mesh trial. It found that Covidien did not adequately warn about the risks of its Symbotex mesh, and it awarded no punitive damages.
Key Developments by Manufacturer
- Bard / Davol (MDL 2846, S.D. Ohio): The October 2024 settlement framework has moved into administration, with a settlement fund established, special masters appointed, and payments made in order of filing date. An intensive process for claims that do not resolve is scheduled to begin in January 2027.
- Covidien / Medtronic (MDL 3029, D. Mass.): Cases are pending in federal court in Boston, in Massachusetts state court, and in a coordinated group in Minnesota. The first trial ended in an $88 million verdict, which the judge said on November 10 she will reduce. Two more trials are set for 2027. No group settlement is in place.
- Atrium C-QUR (MDL 2753, D.N.H.): largely resolved, with a small number of cases still pending.
- Ethicon Physiomesh: substantially resolved through settlements following the May 2016 worldwide market withdrawal.
- Case counts: the court panel that oversees these groups reports pending cases each month. The latest figures for Bard, Covidien and Atrium are on the Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Update.
Why Hernia Mesh Litigation Still Matters
Most people having a hernia repaired expect a straightforward operation. Some come out with lasting pain, a hernia that comes back, an infection, tissue sticking together inside, bowel problems, or another operation to put it right. When that keeps going, people start asking whether the mesh itself was part of the problem.
What Has Changed in Recent Years?
This litigation is older than it was, but it has not gone away. Some product lines have reached settlement and are working through payments. Others still carry large numbers of pending cases. So recent news here is less about new filings and more about settlements being administered and existing cases moving.
Bard / Davol Litigation Remains a Major Part of the Story
Bard-related hernia mesh litigation has remained one of the biggest parts of the national picture. It drew attention for the number of cases filed and for the size of the settlement that followed. The claims center on Bard’s polypropylene mesh products.
Even where settlement activity has become a major theme, that does not mean every claim or every product issue disappeared. For many readers, Bard remains one of the first names they encounter when researching hernia mesh lawsuits.
How the two active groups differ
Two federal groups are still running. The current count for each is on the Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Update.
The larger is the Bard and Davol litigation in Ohio. In October 2024 Bard's parent company agreed to pay over $1 billion to resolve most of the US claims, so that group is now largely about administering settlements. The number of open cases has barely moved through the year, and new cases are still being filed into it.
The smaller one matters more right now. The Covidien litigation in Boston is still going to trial, while Bard has settled most of its cases. In the first Covidien test trial, a Boston jury awarded $88 million on August 4, 2026, over Symbotex mesh.
On September 4 the defense asked the court to set that verdict aside, to order a new trial, and to reduce the award. At a hearing on November 10, Judge Patti B. Saris said she will reduce it. She has not yet set the new amount.
Two more test trials are already set, one for January 11, 2027 and one for March 29, 2027. Test trials show both sides what a case is worth in front of a jury. Their results shape whether Covidien moves toward a settlement of its own.
Did you need more surgery, or live with pain or infection, after hernia repair with mesh? Which mesh you have decides which group of cases you are in. A free case review can help you find out.
Check My EligibilitySome Hernia Mesh MDLs Are Still Active
This has never been about one product or one company. Different groups of cases cover different manufacturers and different product lines. That is why identifying the exact mesh matters so much. Where a claim stands can depend entirely on which one was used.
Physiomesh Still Comes Up Frequently in Research
Ethicon Physiomesh remains one of the most widely researched hernia mesh products because of its litigation history and withdrawal from the market. Even though that specific litigation wave is more mature now, people still look it up when reviewing operative reports, product stickers, or hospital records connected to earlier surgeries.
In many situations, people are not trying to follow day-by-day litigation news. They are trying to understand whether the product named in their records has a history that may help explain why it keeps coming up in hernia mesh discussions.
Why Product-Specific Details Matter
These cases turn on the specific device. Meshes differ in what they are made of, how they are built, what coats them, how they are fixed in place, and whether parts of them dissolve over time. Those differences explain why one person's complications look nothing like another's, and they shape whether a claim works.
Why Revision Surgery Plays Such a Large Role
In many hernia mesh cases, revision or removal surgery becomes a major part of the story. These procedures may reveal mesh shrinkage, folding, tearing, migration, infection, adhesion to surrounding tissue. In some situations, removal is difficult and may itself create additional long-term problems.
That is one reason revision records often become so important in later investigation. They may provide some of the clearest information about what product was used and what complications were actually documented.
What to look into after complications
- Which hernia mesh product was implanted
- Whether the product has been linked to lawsuits
- How to obtain operative and hospital records
- Whether a recurrence or infection may be related to mesh failure
- Whether revision surgery records identify the product more clearly
Why These Claims Remain Medically and Legally Complex
These claims are complicated because everything matters: the medical records, the surgical history, the later complications, and above all which device was used. Most people do not know the model. Years often pass between the original repair and the point where the problems get bad enough to ask legal questions.
That complexity is one reason this topic continues to draw attention even after major settlement announcements. The broader litigation may evolve, but the individual questions people face often stay the same: what product was used, what went wrong, and what records best document it.
What to Watch Next
- The new amount Judge Saris sets for the $88 million verdict, and whether the Pattersons accept it.
- The December 10 hearing and the second Covidien trial on January 11, 2027.
- The ProGrip trial set for March 29, 2027.
- Whether Covidien announces a group settlement. None has been announced.
- Bard payouts, and the process for unresolved Bard claims that starts in January 2027.
None of this pauses the filing deadline in your state. That deadline runs on its own clock.
Learn More About Hernia Mesh Claims
For the current status and case counts, see the Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Update. For makers and product names, see the Hernia Mesh Product List.
Find Out If You May Have a Case
If you experienced complications after hernia mesh surgery, including revision surgery, chronic pain, or mesh failure, you can request a free, no-obligation case review on Lawsuit Center. Knowing your mesh product helps, but it is not required to start.
Educational purposes only. Submitting a case review request does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Explore Related Lawsuit Topics
Ready to explore related cases and legal topics? Browse the lawsuit directory or learn how the legal process works.
If you're trying to understand whether this situation may apply to you, you can share a few details below to get started.
Educational purposes only. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Legal Guides
Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
Get the main overview of hernia mesh claims, complications, and why people research these cases.
Hernia Mesh Product List
Review manufacturers, product families, and product-identification details people often research.
How Lawsuits Work
Get a simple overview of how legal claims are investigated, filed, and resolved over time.
Mass Torts
Understand how coordinated proceedings work when many similar claims move through court together.
