Recent Developments in Transvaginal Mesh Litigation
Last updated:
This case is one of 17 we track. See where each one stands →
The big federal pelvic mesh cases are over. Hundreds of cases against Ethicon and Bard are still active in New Jersey state court. People still look into these products, because pain, erosion, urinary problems and repeat surgery did not end with the federal cases.
This page covers where the cases stand, what has moved recently, and the question that matters most if you are looking into it now: which product was actually implanted.
- The main federal pelvic mesh MDLs have closed. The cases still going are in state courts, mainly New Jersey.
- FDA action in 2019 remains one of the biggest turning points in the transvaginal mesh story.
- People still research these products because complications and product-identification questions continue long after implantation.
- Operative reports, implant stickers, and revision records can still matter a great deal.
Start here
Important notice
This page provides general educational information and does not constitute legal advice.
Where Transvaginal Mesh Cases Stand Now
The federal wave is over. The litigation is not. It moved to state courts, and the center of it is New Jersey.
New Jersey runs two coordinated groups of pelvic mesh cases, one for Ethicon products and one for Bard. As of a case management order in mid-2026, the Ethicon group alone had more than 560 active cases. The court keeps moving cases through evidence-gathering and expert schedules, and some of them are settling one at a time.
New cases are also being filed elsewhere, including Minnesota and Massachusetts, where two of the manufacturers are based.
For scale, the federal proceedings that closed involved more than 107,000 cases, of which more than 75,000 were resolved there. Manufacturers have reportedly paid over $8 billion, and because many settlements are confidential the real figure is likely higher.
If you were implanted with pelvic mesh and had complications, the closure of the federal cases did not close the subject. What matters is which product you had, what your records show, and the filing deadline in your state.
What Has Moved Recently
The dates below run newest first.
- , the New Jersey judge gave the Bard mesh cases more time to gather evidence. The order moved the deadline to June 30, 2026.
- , six women with Ethicon mesh cases told the New Jersey court they had settled. Each asked the court to pause her case while the settlement is finished.
- , a New Jersey order listed more than 575 active Ethicon cases from women whose sling is still implanted. These women used an Ethicon sling for urinary leakage and have not had surgery to remove or revise it.
- , the New Jersey judge moved 37 more Ethicon cases into evidence-gathering. Twenty-one of those cases were still active in mid-2026.
- , a New Jersey order counted more than 1,100 active Ethicon cases from women whose sling is still implanted. The same order moved a group of those cases into evidence-gathering.
- , the FDA ordered manufacturers to stop selling mesh made for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. More on what the order covered.
What Is Transvaginal Mesh?
Transvaginal mesh is surgical mesh used in operations for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. Many patients later reported serious problems: the mesh eroding, lasting pain, infection, bleeding, pain during sex, urinary trouble, and surgery to remove or repair it.
What the FDA Order Covered
The FDA ordered manufacturers to stop selling surgical mesh intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse in the United States.
That order covered mesh made for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Mesh for other procedures, including slings for urinary leakage, stayed on the market. That is why the product and the type of surgery still matter when you look into this.
What Happened to the Major Federal Mesh MDLs?
The largest federal pelvic mesh multidistrict litigations were centralized in the Southern District of West Virginia. The major proceedings involving Bard, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, Ethicon, and Coloplast are now closed.
The main federal wave has passed. Legal questions about pelvic mesh did not end with it, and the cases still going now sit in state courts.
Why Do People Still Research Transvaginal Mesh?
Complications often take years to make sense. People come back to this long after the operation. They want to know which manufacturer made the device, whether other patients reported the same injuries, and what their own records say.
In many situations, product identification becomes one of the most important practical issues. That can include the manufacturer name, product name, operative report, implant records, catalog references, and any other documentation that helps connect a procedure to a specific device.
Why Product Identification Still Matters
Most people start with a general question about mesh lawsuits. The practical next step is narrower: work out which product was used. FDA records can help you identify a manufacturer or product family. The exact device usually comes from the operative report, the implant sticker, hospital records and any paperwork from a later repair surgery.
What to Watch Next
- Whether the New Jersey judge sets a trial date in any Ethicon or Bard case.
- How many of the remaining New Jersey cases report settlements, as six Ethicon cases did in February.
- New cases filed in Minnesota and Massachusetts, where two of the manufacturers are based.
None of this changes the filing deadline in your state. That deadline runs on its own clock.
Common Questions People Ask
Is transvaginal mesh litigation still active?
Yes, in state courts. The federal groups closed, and the cases that continue sit mainly in New Jersey, where the Ethicon group alone held more than 560 active cases in mid-2026. Some of those cases are settling one at a time. New cases are also being filed in Minnesota and Massachusetts.
Did the FDA remove certain transvaginal mesh products from the market?
Yes. In April 2019 the FDA ordered manufacturers to stop selling surgical mesh intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Mesh for other procedures was not covered by that order.
What happened to the major federal mesh MDLs?
The seven groups in the Southern District of West Virginia handled more than 107,000 cases and resolved more than 75,000 of them before closing. Manufacturers have reportedly paid more than $8 billion across those cases and the confidential settlements around them.
How can someone identify which mesh product was implanted?
Start with the operative report and the implant sticker in the hospital record. Records from any later repair or removal surgery often name the device too. FDA records can narrow it to a manufacturer or product family.
Why do people still research transvaginal mesh years later?
Complications such as erosion, pain and repeat surgery can show up long after the operation. People come back to find out which company made the device, whether others reported the same injuries, and what their own records say.
Sources
- Superior Court of New Jersey, Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare multicounty litigation, orders and decisions — Case Management Orders 116 (March 13, 2025), 121 (May 30, 2025), 124 (September 30, 2025) and 130 (April 2026), and the notices of settlement of February 12, 2026
- Superior Court of New Jersey, Pelvic Mesh/Bard multicounty litigation, orders and decisions — order extending discovery, April 9, 2026
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration — order to manufacturers of surgical mesh for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse, April 16, 2019
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia — MDL Nos. 2187, 2325, 2326, 2327, 2387, 2440 and 2511, pelvic repair system litigation
Explore Related Lawsuit Topics
Ready to explore related cases and legal topics? Browse the lawsuit directory or learn how the legal process works.
If you're trying to understand whether this situation may apply to you, you can share a few details below to get started.
Educational purposes only. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Related Legal Guides
Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits
Start with the broader overview of mesh injuries, litigation history, and product-identification issues.
Transvaginal Mesh Manufacturers and Public Product Identifiers
Review manufacturers, product families, and public reference points that may help with product research.
How Lawsuits Work
Get a simple overview of how legal claims are investigated, filed, and resolved over time.
Mass Torts
Understand how coordinated proceedings work when many similar claims move through court together.
