Editorial Policy
Last updated: May 10, 2026
Lawsuit Informer is an attorney-led editorial site covering lawsuits, toxic exposure, product liability, and consumer-facing legal issues. This page explains how the site is written, reviewed, sourced, updated, and corrected, and discloses the relationship between Lawsuit Informer and the separate intake site, lawsuit.center.
Content on Lawsuit Informer is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading the site or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Authorship and Review
Lawsuit Informer is founded, written, and edited by David Meldofsky, a California-licensed attorney (CA Bar No. 263673). Every substantive page is written or reviewed by him before publication. The site does not publish anonymous content or content under undisclosed pen names.
Editorial Standards
The following standards apply to every page on the site:
- Pages explain general legal issues. They do not evaluate any individual reader's potential claim, because that determination depends on facts — exposure history, diagnosis, timing, jurisdiction, and evidence — that no general article can know.
- Where the law is unsettled, the page says so rather than presenting a contested position as established.
- Where regulation and litigation are moving in different directions — as they currently are in PFAS — the page distinguishes the two rather than collapsing them into a single narrative.
- Marketing language is not presented as editorial reporting. Calls-to-action and intake links are clearly identified as such.
- Each substantive page carries a "last updated" date reflecting the most recent review.
Sourcing
Pages draw on publicly available legal materials: court filings, federal and state statutes and regulations, agency guidance (including EPA, FDA, OSHA, CDC, and analogous state agencies), peer-reviewed scientific literature where relevant, and reporting from established legal and general-news outlets. Pages do not rely on anonymous forum posts or content reproduced from competing legal-marketing sites without independent verification.
Use of AI Tools in Drafting
AI tools are used in parts of the research and drafting process. Every published page is reviewed by a licensed attorney before going live. That review checks for legal accuracy, framing, statements that should be qualified or removed, and language that would over-claim what a general educational article can determine. AI tools are not used to fabricate case names, citations, statistics, or attorney commentary, and any quoted material is verified against its source.
Medical Review
Pages discussing symptoms, illness, diagnosis, or toxic exposure include medical content that is reviewed for general accuracy by Dr. Thomas A. Hatzilabrou, M.D. Medical review is for educational accuracy and does not constitute medical advice or create a doctor-patient relationship. Medical review applies to the medical portions of relevant pages; it does not extend to legal analysis, which remains the responsibility of the attorney author.
Updates and Review Schedule
- New pages are reviewed before publication.
- Pages on actively developing topics — including PFAS, AFFF, talc, Roundup, Depo-Provera, and similar mass-tort areas — are reviewed on a rolling basis as regulations, MDL developments, settlements, or scientific findings change.
- Pages on more stable topics are reviewed periodically as needed.
- Substantive updates change the "last updated" date shown on the page.
Independence and Site Relationships
Lawsuit Informer is an editorial site. It does not directly provide legal representation through this website. Calls-to-action on Lawsuit Informer link to lawsuit.center, a separate site operated by the same founder that functions as a searchable directory and client intake hub.
Readers should be aware of the following:
- Lawsuit Informer and lawsuit.center are operated by the same person, David Meldofsky.
- Submitting information through lawsuit.center does not by itself create an attorney-client relationship with David Meldofsky or with any law firm a reader may be referred to.
- Editorial decisions on Lawsuit Informer — including which topics to cover, how to frame them, and what limits to disclose — are made by the editorial author, not by any third-party law firm.
What the Site Does Not Do
- It does not evaluate the merits of any individual reader's potential claim.
- It does not provide legal advice through articles, forms, or messaging.
- It does not publish sponsored content presented as editorial reporting.
- It does not guarantee that any specific page is current at the exact moment a reader sees it. The "last updated" date is the most reliable signal of when a page was last reviewed.
Corrections
If you believe a page contains a factual error, an outdated citation, or a misleading statement, please submit a correction request through the Contact Page. Correction requests are reviewed within a reasonable period. When a substantive correction is made, the "last updated" date is changed, and where appropriate, a correction note is added to the page describing what was changed.
Educational Purpose
Information on Lawsuit Informer is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this website, submitting information through a form, or contacting Lawsuit Informer does not create an attorney-client relationship. Anyone seeking legal advice about a specific situation should consult a qualified attorney directly.
Editorial Contact
For editorial inquiries, correction requests, or media questions, please use the Contact Page.
Related Pages
- About Lawsuit Informer
- Founder: David Meldofsky
- Medical Reviewer: Dr. Thomas A. Hatzilabrou, M.D.
- Contact
- Privacy Policy
- Legal Disclaimer
Want to explore legal topics?
Browse lawsuit categories, learn how cases work, or explore toxic exposure topics.